Source of Variation

DF

Mean squares

DM

NMS

NTPH

TS(cm)

TYQha-1

WMY(Kg)

WUMYKgpp

Replication

2

20.57

5.48

9.56

42.69

16501

0.5422

0.051

Variety

7

95.14**

3.39

60.914**

72.08*

25764*

5.0399**

0.119

Location

1

137.76**

0.27

14.714

4.78

71049*

1.4166

0.018

Year

1

1464.84**

96.25**

206.85**

1141.84**

1547

0.4323

0.05

Variety*Location

7

1.784

6.48*

17.098*

29.39

12582

1.895*

0.0366

Variety*Year

7

68.82**

5.098*

18.923*

56.21

5923

1.0708

0.068*

Location*Year

1

137.76**

34.79**

119.44**

30.28

390

7.4195*

0.201*

Variety*Location *Year

7

1.784

6.514*

9.448

18.52

11473

0.889

0.0362

Error

62

3.637

2.023

7.756

26.77

7206

0.7648

0.039

Where DF = Degree freedom of error; DM = Days to 90% maturity; DR=disease reaction; NMS = Number of main stem; NTPH = Number of tuber per hill; TS= tuber size in centimeter; TYtha-1 =total tuber yield in tone per hectare; WMY=weight of marketable yield; WUMYH= Weight of marketable yield; *and ** represent significant and highly significant effect respectively
Table 1: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for Performance evaluation of potato varieties

Variety

Year
1                   2

 

 

Dagim

103.3g

110.3a

Belete

97.7h

109.8ab

Hunde

104.3fg

109.2abc

Gudane

107.7bcde

108.2abcd

Jalane

93.7j

107.7bcde

Gera

95.3ij

107cde

Local

97hi

106.3def

Ararsa

102.7g

105.7ef

LSD(0.05)

2.201

 

CV (%)

1.8

 

Table 2: The markers for analysis of fragrance in rice

Variety

Location

Year
1                   2

 

 

 

Belete

Aleku Badeso

9.667a

3.583f-m

Nedjo

5.111c-j

2.861j-m

 

Ararsa

Aleku Badeso

3.222h-m

3.417g-m

Nedjo

8.222ab

1.417m

 

Local

Aleku Badeso

5c-j

4.833c-k

Nedjo

7.111bc

3.917e-l

 

Jalane

Aleku Badeso

3.889e-l

3.667f-m

Nedjo

6.778bcd

3.625f-m

 

Hunde

Aleku Badeso

4e-l

3.083i-m

Nedjo

6.111b-e

2.528klm

 

Dagim

Aleku Badeso

5.444c-h

4.583d-l

Nedjo

5.778c-f

2.5lm

 

Gudane

Aleku Badeso

5.222c-i

5.667c-g

Nedjo

5c-ij

2.917i-m

 

Gera

Aleku Badeso

3.444g-m

4.667d-l

Nedjo

4.556d-l

3.25h-m

LSD(0.05)

2.3

 

 

CV (%)

31.4

 

 

Means in columns and rows followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance; LSD (0.05) = Least Significant Difference at 5% level; CV= Coefficient of variation
Table 3: Interaction effect of variety, location and year on number of main stem

Variety

Year
1                   2

 

 

Belete

16.44a

11.62 def

Gudane

15 abc

16.17 ab

Local

15.28 abc

12.23 cdef

Gera

13.22 bcd

10.08 defg

Hunde

13.11 bcd

6.75 h

Jalane

12.56 cde

7.69 gh

Dagim

11.44 def

9.17 fgh

Ararsa

9.89 efgh

9.75 efgh

LSD(0.05)

2.3

 

CV(%)

31.4

 

Means in columns and rows followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance; LSD (0.05) = Least Significant Difference at 5% level; CV= Coefficient of variation
Table 4: The interaction effect of variety and year on number of tuber per hill

Variety

Location

Aleku Badeso

Nedjo

Gudane

11.97 b

16.1 a

Belete

15.79 a

15.38 a

Jalane

11.86 b

15.65 a

Hunde

11.92 b

11.39 bc

Local

10.01 bc

9.85 bc

Dagim

10.89 bc

9.35 bc

Ararsa

11.18 bc

9.43 bc

Gera

8.44 c

11.19 bc

LSD(0.05)

3.2

CV(%)

23.4

Means in columns and rows followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance; LSD (0.05) = Least Significant Difference at 5% level; CV= Coefficient of variation
Table 5: The interaction effect of variety and location on number of tuber per hill

Variety

Tuber size(cm)

Belete

27.95 a

Dagim

25.64 ab

Gera

24.93 ab

Ararsa

24.71 ab

Hunde

24.21 ab

Jalane

22.52 bc

Gudane

22.35 bc

Local

19.83 c

LSD(0.05)

4.223

Year

 

1

27.47a

2

20.57b

LSD(0.05)

4.223

CV (%)

21.5

Means in columns and rows followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance; LSD (0.05) = Least Significant Difference at 5% level; CV= Coefficient of variation
Table 6: Main effect of variety and year on tuber size of potato varieties

Variety

Total tuber yield(t/ha)

Belete

38.59a

Gudane

35.54ab

Gera

34.82ab

Local

34.11ab

Jalane

34.02ab

Hunde

31.18b

Dagim

31.08b

Ararsa

23.16c

LSD(0.05)

64.832

Location

 

Aleku Badeso

35.15a

Nedjo

30.47b

LSD(0.05)

32.416

CV (%)

24.2

Means in columns and rows followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance; LSD (0.05) = Least Significant Difference at 5% level; CV= Coefficient of variation
Table 7: Main effect of variety and year on total tuber yield t/ha (TYt/ha) of potato varieties

 

Location

Variety

Aleku Badeso

Nedjo

Gudane

3.365abc

4.321a

Belete

3.702ab

3.344abc

Dagim

3.2bcd

1.695fg

Hunde

2.914bcde

2.924bcde

Gera

2.652cdef

2.705bcde

Ararsa

2.603cdef

1.394g

Jalane

2.161efg

2.457cdef

Local

2.33defg

2.145efg

LSD(0.05)

1.009

 

CV (%)

31.7

 

Means in columns and rows followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance; LSD (0.05) = Least Significant Difference at 5% level; CV= Coefficient of variation
Table 8: Interaction effect of variety and location on weigh of marketable yield

Variety

Year

 

 

1

2

Dagim

0.37667a

0.07167b

Hunde

0b

0.17833b

Ararsa

0.17638b

0.11833b

Local

0.12962b

0b

Belete

0.10792b

0.075b

Gudane

0.07367b

0.08b

Gera

0.06932b

0.06167b

Jalane

0b

0.05633b

LSD(0.05)

0.19

 

CV (%)

31.5

 

Means in columns and rows followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance; LSD (0.05) = Least Significant Difference at 5% level; CV= Coefficient of variation
Table 9: Interaction effect of variety and year on unmarketable yield of potato verities