Figure 1: Uracil, the original pyridinone lead structure and the optimized pyridazine

Figure 2:Lead structure discovery from NMF to a the antineoplastic lead structures

Figure 3: Crystal structure of N-(3,4-Dichloro-5-oxo-2,5-dihydro-furan-2-yl)-N-methyl-acetamide AAF.

Scheme 1: Synthesis of analogues
a) xylene, AlCl3, RT b) semicarbazide/hydrazine, MeOH; reflux acetic acid
c) amide, toluene, reflux

Entry
Structure
Yield (%)
MAC 13
IC50 [mM]
MAC 16
IC50 [mM]
MCA
Muco chloric acid
Muco chloric acid
>100

>100

MXAA
Acrylic acid
85
50±3

70±5

AAF

Amido-furanone

31
18±3

4±2

R=H
Amido-furanone
20
17±1
11±1
Aryl
Pyridazine
39
17±2
35±3
DCPYR
Pyridazine
73
7±0.6
5±0.4

Table 1: In vitro activity / cytotoxicity of synthesized analogues

Entry

Administration
(mg/kg)

Tumor
Inhibition (%)
Body-
weight (g)
Treatment (days)
Water
0
-
+0.1±0.05
1 - 10
MXAA

10

20

14±2.1

25±2.6

-2.3±0.2

-1.3±0.3

1 - 7

1 - 10
         
AAF
50
26±1.5
-1.5±0.1
1 - 10
         
DCPYR
50
53±3.1
-0.9±0.09
1 - 10
         
5-FU
50
27±2.1
-1.1±0.1
1 - 10

Route of administration: IP in propylene glycol
Table 2: In vivo data of selected molecules against MAC 16 cell lines