Figure 1: Dynamics of the variables heterogeneity index in the studied plantings depending on the size of sampling

A2 and C2 – These symbols designate various conditions of growth:
A2 - poorer, C2 - richer.
Figure 2: General scheme of highly heterogeneous forest mosaic planting
Тumber 2 means average degree of poverty or wealth.

Figure 3: Group of pine (Pinus sylvestris), As elementary unit of planting Plants have to be placed in planting not on one and not in ranks, but in groups

Figure 4: Coniferous /deciduous ecotone as ecological barrier for many pathogens

Resulting plantings

Plant complexes

General Heterogeneit, bit

Forest stand

Subgr-owth

Under-brush

Grassy cover

Natural overgrowing of mixed plants

1,68

1,84

1,91

1,36

6,97

Monocultures of the pine (P. sylvestris)

0,72

0

0

0,92

1,64

Table 1: Heterogeneity of the plant complexes in the center of the pathogen (Heterobasidion annosum) under the influence of free competition and of monocultures of the pine (Pinus sylvestris)

Plantings

Infection, %

Homogeneous (one-species, one-aged/ ten-year-old, linear)

83,6

Heterogeneous (mixed-species, uneven-ageв, group-shaped)

12,7

Table 2: Infection of Erisiphe alphitoides in homogeneous and heterogeneous oak plantings

Plantings

Development of the disease, %

Sizes of konidiya, µм

Parameters of kleystotetia

Length

Width

Diameter, µm

Frequency, n/cm2

Open

78

32

18

99

64

Ecologically isolated

16

24

13

74

8

Table 3: Development of powdery mildew on oak trees in open and ecologically isolated plantings