Figure 1: Effect of Nitrogen on fruit yield of Naga chilli

Figure 2: Effect of P on fruit yield of Naga chilli

Figure 3: Effect of K on fruit yield of Naga chilli

Figure 4: Effect of S on fruit yield of Naga chilli

Texture

 

pH

OM

Ca

Mg

K

Total N

P

S

B

Zn

Cu

Fe

Mn

 

%

(meq/100g soil)

%

(ug/g soil)

 

 

Sandy loam

5.9

1.12

2.8

0.91

0.28

0.071

28

18

0.11

1.13

0.07

12.2

2.2

Critical level

-

-

2.0

0.8

0.20

-

14

14

0.2

2.0

0.2

10

5

Table 1: Analytical data of the experimental soil

 

December, 2014

January, 2015

February, 2015

March, 2015

April, 2015

May, 2015

Max. temp.

26.5

28.7

32.0

31.9

34.2

35.1

Min. temp.

7.8

13.7

16.4

19.0

21.2

24.4

Precipitation

2

0

7

60

536

992

Relative humidity

70

62

57

60

79

81

Table 2: Weather data for the experimental period

 

Plant height (cm)

Stem diameter (cm)

Canopy Spreading

 

 

 

N/S

E/W

T1 = N0 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

70.48 g

4.63 c

63.7 d-g

65.8 d-f

T2 = N80 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

72.51 e-g

5.40 a-c

70.7 c

74.8 bc

T3 = N100 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

88.50 a

6.30 a

88.0 a

88.2 a

T4 = N120 P75K120 S20 kg/ha

75.10 d-f

4.80 bc

66.5 c-f

59.5 fg

T5 = N100 P0 K120 S20 kg/ha

71.45 fg

5.47 a-c

68.8 c-f

68.7 c-e

T6 = N100 P50 K120 S20 kg/ha

83.35 b

5.23 ab

77.7 b

64.8 d-g

T7= N100 P100 K120 S20 kg/ha

77.51cd

4.63 c

68.7 c-e

70.8 b-d

T8= N100 P75 K0 S20 kg/ha

74.70 d-g

4.80 bc

68.8 c-e

68.2 c-e

T9= N100 P75 K100 S20 kg/ha

71.66 fg

4.80 bc

62.5 fg

68.6 c-e

T10= N100 P75 K140 S20 kg/ha

73.54 d-g

4.67 bc

59.6 g

65.6 d-f

T11= N100 P75 K120 S0 kg/ha

80.45 bc

5.50 a-c

68.8 cd

70.7b-d

T12= N100 P75 K120 S10 kg/ha

73.53 d-g

4.80 bc

62.8 e-g

62.4 e-g

T13= N100 P75K120 S30 kg/ha

76.61 c-e

4.73 bc

63.4 d-g

75.7 b

T14= N0 P0 K0 S0 kg/ha

62.52 h

3.8 d

58.0 g

58.4 g

LSD

3.94

0.85

5.22

6.27

CV (%)

3.13

11.17

4.60

5.45

In a column means followed by common letters are not significantly different from each other at 5 % level of probability by DMRT
Table 3: Growth characteristics of Naga chili as influenced by different doses of NPKS in 2014-15

Treatment

Fruit size (cm)

Pericarp (g/fruit)

No. of seeds /fruit (No.)

1000 seed weight (g)

 

Length

Diameter

 

 

 

T1 = N0 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

4.67 f

2.39 c-f

3.42 h

35.30 de

11.14 d

T2 = N80 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

5.47 de

2.80 ab

4.38 c

37.01 c

10.06 f

T3 = N100 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

6.63 a

3.03 a

3.91ef

39.54 a

12.20 a

T4 = N120 P75K120 S20 kg/ha

4.66 f

2.65 bc

4.99 a

35.88 d

10.56 e

T5 = N100 P0 K120 S20 kg/ha

5.77 c-e

2.35 def

3.54 g

35.37 d

11.70 bc

T6 = N100 P50 K120 S20 kg/ha

5.56 de

2.43 c-f

3.92 ef

38.07 b

11.15 d

T7= N100 P100 K120 S20 kg/ha

6.00 bc

2.30 ef

3.83 f

38.52 b

10.02 f

T8= N100 P75 K0 S20 kg/ha

5.80 c-e

2.57 b-e

3.99 de

34.50 ef

9.483 g

T9= N100 P75 K100 S20 kg/ha

6.37 a

2.40 c-f

3.57 gh

37.97 b

10.00 f

T10= N100 P75 K140 S20 kg/ha

5.60 de

2.59 b-d

4.07 d

34.00 f

11.01 d

T11= N100 P75 K120 S0 kg/ha

6.33 ab

2.30 ef

4.57 b

32.10 h

11.60 c

T12= N100 P75 K120 S10 kg/ha

5.83 cd

2.60 b-d

4.97 a

33.00 g

12.00 ab

T13= N100 P75K120 S30 kg/ha

5.50 de

2.70 b

4.95 a

37.11 c

11.79 bc

T14= N0 P0 K0 S0 kg/ha

5.43 e

2.25 f

2.97 i

31.05 i

9.07 h

LSD

0.3357

0.2374

0.1187

0.8188

0.302

CV (%)

3.51

5.63

1.69

1.37

1.65

In a column means followed by common letters are not significantly different from each other at 5 % level of probability by DMRT.
Table 4: Effect of NPKS on fruit characterstics and 1000 seed weight of naga chilli

Treatment

Fruits /plant (No.)

Individual fruit weight (g)

Yield/plant (g)

Yield (t/ha)

T1 = N0 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

141.3 h

3.91 j

552.5 k

15.35 h

T2 = N80 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

180.0 c

4.88 d

878.4 c

24.40 b

T3 = N100 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha

208.0 a

4.47 g

927.8 a

25.77 a

T4 = N120 P75K120 S20 kg/ha

122.5 j

5.50 a

673.8 g

18.72 f

T5 = N100 P0 K120 S20 kg/ha

150.0 f

4.05 i

607.6 j

16.88 g

T6 = N100 P50 K120 S20 kg/ha

200.0 b

4.47 g

894.0 b

24.83 b

T7= N100 P100 K120 S20 kg/ha

146.7 fg

4.27 h

626.5 h

17.40 g

T8= N100 P75 K0 S20 kg/ha

120.5 j

4.00 ij

482.2 l

13.40 i

T9= N100 P75 K100 S20 kg/ha

169.0 d

4.56 f

770.6 e

21.41 d

T10= N100 P75 K140 S20 kg/ha

132.2 i

4.66 e

616.6 i

17.13 g

T11= N100 P75 K120 S0 kg/ha

140.0 h

5.26 b

737.7 f

20.49 e

T12= N100 P75 K120 S10 kg/ha

165.0 e

5.02 c

826.6 d

22.96 c

T13= N100 P75K120 S30 kg/ha

143.4 gh

5.42 a

777.2 e

21.59 d

T14= N0 P0 K0 S0 kg/ha

90.3 k

3.50 k

315.1 m

8.75 j

LSD

4.146

0.092

8.419

0.8944

CV (%)

1.64

1.14

0.72

2.77

In a column means followed by common letters are not significantly different from each other at 5 % level of probability by DMRT
Table 5: Analytical data of the experimental soil

Nutrient

Treatment code

Level (kg /ha)

Fruit yield (t/ha)

% yield increase over control

 

N

T1

0

15.35

-

T2

80

24.40

58.96

T3

100

25.77

67.89

T4

120

18.72

21.95

 

P

T5

0

16.88

-

T6

50

24.83

47.10

T3

75

25.77

52.67

T7

100

17.40

3.08

 

K

T8

0

13.40

-

T9

100

21.40

59.70

T3

120

25.77

92.31

T10

140

17.13

27.84

 

S

T11

0

20.49

-

T12

10

22.96

12.05

T3

20

25.77

25.77

T13

30

21.59

5.37

Table 6: Single effect of N, P, K and S on the fruit yield of Naga chilli

 

Nutrient

 

Regression equation

 

Optimum dose (kg /ha)

 

Maximum fruit yield (t/ha) for optimum dose

Production of fruit (t/ha) for 1 kg nutrient (use efficiency)

Beyond optimum dose the reduction of fruit yield (t/ha)
for kg nutrient

N

y = -0.0024 x2 + 0.320x+ 15.26

66.7

26.53

0.16

2.4

P

y = -0.0035x2 + 0.3605x
+ 16.68

51.5

25.97

0.18

3.5

K

y = -0.0026 x2 + 0.4932x
-0.1034

94.9

23.29

0.25

2.6

S

y = -0.0166 x2 + 0.5598x+ 20.12

16.9

24.83

0.28

16.6

Table 7: Response function of Naga chilli to N, P, K & S

Treatment

Gross return
(Tk./m2)

Variable cost
(Tk./m2)

Gross margin
(Tk./m2)

Remarks

T1

618.19

1.98

616.21

CD

T2

787.50

2.31

785.19

CD

T3

875.00

2.41

872.59

CD

T4

535.94

2.5

533.44

CD

T5

656.25

1.26

654.99

CU

T6

910.00

2.01

907.99

CU

T7

641.81

2.76

639.05

CD

T8

527.19

2.06

525.13

CD

T9

739.38

2.48

736.9

CD

T10

578.38

2.6

575.78

CD

T11

722.00

2.06

719.94

CD

T12

612.50

2.23

610.27

CD

T13

627.38

2.56

624.82

CD

T14

395.06

0

395.06

CU

T1 = N0 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha T5 = N100 P0 K120 S20 kg/ha T9= N100 P75 K100 S20 kg/ha T13= N100 P75K120 S30 kg/ha
T2 = N80 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha T6 = N100 P50 K120 S20 kg/ha T10= N100 P75 K140 S20 kg/ha T14= N0 P0 K0 S0 kg/ha (Native Nutrient)
T3 = N100 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha T7= N100 P100 K120 S20 kg/ha  T11= N100 P75 K120 S0 kg/ha  CU= Cost undominated
T4 = N120 P75K120 S20   kg/ha T8= N100 P75 K0 S20 kg/ha  T12= N100 P75 K120 S10 kg/ha CD= Cost dominated
Table 8: Partial budget and dominance analysis for different fertilizer response data of naga chilli

Treatment

Gross return (Tk./m2)

Variable cost (Tk./ m2)

Marginal increase in Gross return (Tk./m2)

Marginal increase in variable cost (Tk./m2)

Marginal rate of return (%)

T6

910

2.01

253.75

0.75

33833.33

T5

656.25

1.26

261.19

1.26

20729.37

T14

395.06

0

395.06

0

0

T1 = N0 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha T4 = N120 P75K120 S20 kg/ha T7= N100 P100 K120 S20 kg/ha T10= N100 P75 K140 S20 kg/ha T13= N100 P75K120 S30 kg/ha
T2 = N80 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha T5 = N100 P0 K120 S20 kg/ha T8= N100 P75 K0 S20 kg/ha T11= N100 P75 K120 S0 kg/ha T14= N0 P0 K0 S0 kg/ha (Native Nutrient)
T3 = N100 P75 K120 S20 kg/ha T6 = N100 P50 K120 S20 kg/ha T9= N100 P75 K100 S20 kg/ha T12= N100 P75 K120 S10 kg/ha
Table 9: Marginal analysis of undominated fertilizers response data of Naga chilli