Figure 1: Transpiration water harvesting from Azadiractha indica

Figure 2: Flow chart of Source of Transpiration Water and its Harvesting

Figure 3: Transpiration Water Harvested Per Branch (L) from Different Tree Species

Figure 4:Transpiration Water Harvesting Potential per Tree (L) from Different Tree Species

Figure 5: Transpiration Water Harvesting Potential per Hectare (L) From a Tree Stand

Figure 6: Soil Moisture (%) Under Different Species during the Study Period

Species

Evaporation (mm day-1)

Sunshine hours

Humidity (%)

Maximum temperature (°C)

Minimum temperature (°C)

Azadiractha indica

5.90c±0.38

9.90ba±0.62

34.90c±1.70

37.90b±0.99

16.20d±0.82

Prosopis cineraria

6.00cb±0.12

8.40d±2.16

39.30b±5.40

37.00c±1.29

16.60d±0.73

Syzygium cumini

6.20b±0.26

10.50a±0.47

45.00a±2.70

37.92b±0.92

19.60c±2.24

Eucalyptus hybrid

5.92c±1.14

9.00c±1.38

45.80a±6.97

37.10c±1.51

20.80a±1.56

Achras sapota

6.50a±1.37

9.70b±1.81

34.30c±3.30

39.60a±1.22

18.30b±2.13

Values are means ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05
Table 1: Species- wise Climatic Parameters Recorded during Study Periods

Sunshine hours

Species

Leaf area (cm2)

No. of branches per tree

Tree density per ha

Azadiractha indica

4.26c±0.96

25.00a±8.50

40.00b

Prosopis cineraria

0.35d±0.35

15.00c±7.80

50.00a

Syzygium cumini

9.97a±0.57

20.00b±3.50

20.00d

Eucalyptus hybrid

6.58b±1.45

22.00ab±5.80

42.00b

Achras sapota

8.40ab±0.37

23.00ab±10.45

25.00c

Values are means ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05
Table 2:
Leaf area (m2), Number of branches per tree and tree density per hectare of different species