(a): Testing frame;    (b): Diagram showing the method of testing plate specimens
Figure 1: Details of typical plate specimen under the impact test

 

Photo 1(a-c): The damage of the nano ferrocement plates was generally local

 

Figure 2: Effect of number of wire mesh layers vs. mixing ratio on the amount of energy causing first crack of nano plate specimens

 

Figure 3: Effect of number of wire mesh layers vs. mixing ratio on the amount of energy causing full perforation of nano plate specimens

Figure 4 : The effect of changing number of wire mesh layers and mixing ratios with different thickness values on Irs values

 

Specification

Parameter

200(160-240)

Specific surface , m2/g

3.7-4.7

Ph-value

3

Loss on drying, %

>99.0

Sio2- concentration, %

Table1: Chemical composition of fumed silica

Burn Loses%

SO3 %

Sio2,Al2o3,fe2o3%

1.37

2.1

95.53

Table 2: Chemical composition of metakaoline clay

s

s/c

t

n

s

s/c

t

n

s

s/c

t

n

s

s/c

t

n

S

s/c

t

n

01

1

4

2

11

1.5

4

2

21

2

4

2

31

2.5

4

2

41

3

4

2

02

1

6

2

12

1.5

6

2

22

2

6

2

32

2.5

6

2

42

3

6

2

03

1

6

4

13

1.5

6

4

23

2

6

4

33

2.5

6

4

43

3

6

4

04

1

8

2

14

1.5

8

2

24

2

8

2

34

2.5

8

2

44

3

8

2

05

1

8

4

15

1.5

8

4

25

2

8

4

35

2.5

8

4

45

3

8

4

06

1

8

6

16

1.5

8

6

26

2

8

6

36

2.5

8

6

46

3

8

6

07

1

10

2

17

1.5

10

2

27

2

10

2

37

2.5

10

2

47

3

10

2

08

1

10

4

18

1.5

10

4

28

2

10

4

38

2.5

10

4

48

3

10

4

09

1

10

6

19

1.5

10

6

29

2

10

6

39

2.5

10

6

49

3

10

6

10

1

10

8

20

1.5

10

8

30

2

10

8

40

2.5

10

8

50

3

10

8

s: specimen; s/c: sand/cement ratio; t: prism thickness, mm; n: number of wire mesh layers
Table 3: The Nano ferrocement plate specimens considered in the present investigation

plate spec.

Number of blows to cause:

Impact energy (J)* to cause:

Residual impact strength ratio (Irs)

First crack

Full perforation

First crack

Full perforation

01

5

1

75

15

5

02

5

1

75

15

5

03

12

2

180

30

6

04

6

1

90

15

6

05

13

2

195

30

6.5

06

21

2

315

30

10.5

07

8

1

120

15

8

08

17

2

255

30

8.5

09

23

3

345

45

7.667

10

28

3

420

45

9.333

11

7

1

105

15

7

12

8

1

120

15

8

13

14

2

210

30

7

14

7

1

105

15

7

15

17

2

255

30

8.5

16

25

4

375

60

6.25

17

11

1

165

15

11

18

22

3

330

45

7.333

19

29

4

435

60

7.25

20

34

6

510

90

5.667

21

4

1

60

15

4

22

5

1

75

15

5

23

10

2

150

30

5

24

5

1

75

15

5

25

11

2

165

30

5.5

26

17

2

255

30

8.5

27

6

1

90

15

6

28

14

3

210

45

4.667

29

16

3

240

45

5.333

30

21

4

315

60

5.25

31

3

1

45

15

3

32

5

1

75

15

5

33

11

2

165

30

5.5

34

4

1

60

15

4

35

9

2

135

30

4.5

36

14

1

210

15

14

37

5

1

75

15

5

38

12

2

180

30

6

39

15

3

225

45

5

40

17

3

255

45

5.667

41

3

1

45

15

3

42

3

1

45

15

3

43

8

1

120

15

8

44

4

1

60

15

4

45

8

2

120

30

4

47

4

1

60

15

4

48

9

2

135

30

4.5

49

10

2

150

30

5

50

15

3

225

45

5

*The impact energy is computed by: U = n.W.h
Where: U = Impact energy in Joules (N.m)
n = Number of blows
W = Weight of the hammer in N
H = Drop height in m
Table 4: Measured values of number of blows to cause first crack and full perforation